Tuning that nobody signed
Engineering raises a threshold to fix a queue backlog. The change works, the backlog drops, and nobody in compliance approved a lower level of coverage.



28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Aiden FluxSenior AI Fraud Risk AnalystFraud Detection & Risk Scoring
Rhea LedgerSenior AI KYC/AML Compliance DirectorKYC/AML & Sanctions Screening
Nova SentinelLead AI Zero Trust Security ArchitectZero Trust Access Security
Iris VermaAI Verification SpecialistIdentity Verification & KYC
Oscar GraySenior AI OSINT Intelligence DirectorOSINT & Threat Intelligence
Bella NovaAI BNPL Risk AnalystBNPL Risk Monitoring


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Dasha Relia — Lead AI Compliance-Reliability EngineerDasha Relia is an AI agent that adds compliance gates to your change process. New rules, models and configuration changes are checked against your controls and signed off by a named person before go-live. After release she watches for compliance drift and flags it to the owner with the change that likely caused it.

A threshold gets raised to cut alert volume. A model is retrained on new data. A screening list setting changes in a vendor release. Each one changes what your controls catch, and compliance often hears about it after an examiner does.
changes reaching production
Every tuned threshold is a compliance decision.
Engineering raises a threshold to fix a queue backlog. The change works, the backlog drops, and nobody in compliance approved a lower level of coverage.
The change ticket says the rule was tested. The test results are on a laptop. An examiner asking for them a year later gets an apology.
A rule or model behaves as tested on launch day, then customer behaviour shifts. Alert rates move and nobody connects it back to the change.
Dasha Relia is a Lead AI Compliance-Reliability Engineer. She sits in your change process for compliance systems and checks that every rule, model and configuration change carries an owner, test evidence and a sign-off before it goes live.

We don't publish performance numbers from our own tests. Run Dasha Relia over your last few months of changes and see what she would have caught.
Dasha Relia connects to your change and release tools through APIs. Your release process stays yours.
Dasha reads change tickets, rule and model repositories, configuration for screening and monitoring, and FluxForce agent settings. You tell her which changes count as compliance-relevant.
For each change she looks for an owner, a reason, test evidence, expected impact on alert volume and the controls it touches. Open items go back to the change owner in plain English.
Your autonomy settings decide what happens next. A routine change with complete evidence can have its checks marked complete if you allow it. Anything touching thresholds, models or coverage goes to a named approver for sign-off.
After release Dasha compares alert rates, scores and coverage with the expected impact. Drift goes to the owner with the change that likely caused it. Every gate result and approval goes into tamper-evident evidence storage.
Run Dasha Relia in shadow mode over your recent change history. She checks each change and reports what she would have held, and nothing in your release process changes. Compare her findings with your last change audit.
Dasha doesn't make you compliant. She keeps the change evidence these frameworks expect you to show.
Every relevant change reaches you before go-live, with the evidence attached.
| CRITERIA | Manual change board | Pipeline checks only | Dasha Relia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance review of changes | If someone raises it | Code quality, not compliance impact | Every change you mark as compliance-relevant |
| Who signs off | The change board | Engineering | A named compliance approver |
| Evidence kept | Minutes and tickets | Build logs | Owner, tests, impact, approver, in one record |
| After release | Nothing until the next review | Uptime and errors | Watches for compliance drift |
| Pace of release | Waits for the next meeting | Fast | Adds a gate step, routine changes move quickly where you allow it |
| Where it's weaker | Slow, and misses changes nobody brings | Blind to compliance impact | Only sees changes that go through connected tools. Hotfixes made outside them stay invisible to her |
Dasha guards the gate. These agents supply the checks and controls she gates against.

Adds security scan results to each change before Dasha's compliance gate.
Meet Devon
Supplies the approved controls each change is checked against.
Meet Zara
Provides model validation and version records for model changes at the gate.
Meet RiyaLow risk can run on its own if you allow it. Medium risk goes to a person by default. High risk always goes to a person. You set the bands per rule, channel and transaction type.
Turn Dasha off without touching the other agents or your core systems. The switch, and who used it, is stamped on the record.
Run Dasha on live data with nothing blocked or closed. Compare the calls with your team's before anything changes.
Every decision answers why, in plain English, with the signals and the rule or policy behind it.
Each decision is stored with its inputs, its reasoning and the person who approved it, in tamper-evident evidence storage.
Agents connect beside your systems through APIs. Your core banking, screening and case tools stay where they are.
What we're learning about AML, fraud and the evidence examiners ask for.






Talk to the people who build the agents. We'll answer per capability, yes or no.
An AI compliance engineer checks changes to compliance systems before and after release. Dasha Relia looks at each rule, model or configuration change for an owner, test evidence, expected impact and a named approver, then watches the change in production for compliance drift.
No. A named person signs off every change that touches thresholds, models or coverage. Dasha can mark a routine change's checks complete only where you allow it, and can hold a change at the gate for review if you set her to. A kill switch turns her off without touching your release process.
It's when a rule, model or setting starts catching something different from what it was approved to catch. Customer behaviour shifts, data feeds change or a later change interacts with an earlier one. Dasha compares live results with the expected impact recorded at release and flags the gap.
Dasha reads your recent change history and live results, and reports what she would have flagged or held. Nothing in your release process changes. You compare her findings with your last change audit and decide what to switch on.
Access to change tickets, rule and model repositories, screening and monitoring configuration, and alert volumes over time. Past audit findings on change control help her focus on what your examiners have already raised.
No. Your tickets and pipeline stay as they are. Dasha adds a compliance gate and a change record on top.
FluxForce runs as SaaS, on-premise or hybrid, built on Microsoft Azure. We agree data residency and which components run inside your environment during deployment design, before any data moves.
Run Dasha Relia beside your current process. She works on your live data and records every call, and nothing is blocked, closed or sent until you decide.
Shadow mode results belong to you.
Start with one workflow in shadow mode, then decide how much each agent does on its own.