Records must let you rebuild the case
FATF Recommendation 11 expects records detailed enough to reconstruct individual transactions. Notes scattered across tools make that hard.



28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Aiden FluxSenior AI Fraud Risk AnalystFraud Detection & Risk Scoring
Rhea LedgerSenior AI KYC/AML Compliance DirectorKYC/AML & Sanctions Screening
Nova SentinelLead AI Zero Trust Security ArchitectZero Trust Access Security
Iris VermaAI Verification SpecialistIdentity Verification & KYC
Oscar GraySenior AI OSINT Intelligence DirectorOSINT & Threat Intelligence
Bella NovaAI BNPL Risk AnalystBNPL Risk Monitoring


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All SolutionsAlerts from monitoring, fraud and screening land in one case file with the transactions, customer profile and match reasoning already there. Analysts work the case, record their decision and reason code, and pass it to reporting without copying anything across. Every action is timestamped, so a supervisor or examiner can replay how the case was handled.
Monitoring, fraud and screening alerts live in different tools. Analysts open each one, copy the data into a case, and write the story by hand. The decision itself takes minutes.
FATF Recommendation 11 expects records detailed enough to reconstruct individual transactions. Notes scattered across tools make that hard.
Every copy from one system to another is a chance for an error, and a gap an examiner can find.
Without a timestamped history, quality review means asking the analyst to remember what they did and why.
The agents build the case before the analyst opens it. The analyst investigates, decides and records why.
We'll measure time per case on your own alerts in shadow mode, so you see the change on your team's actual work.
Alerts from every source on one customer, in one place.
Case facts flow to reporting without copying.
Reason codes on every close and escalation.
Queues, ageing and samples without a spreadsheet.
One builds the record, one supplies the risk view, one drafts the story.
Builds the case file and links every step to its evidence.
Supplies the activity analysis behind each alert.
Drafts the case narrative from the evidence trail for the analyst to edit.
AML, fraud and claims teams investigate differently. The case file adapts to each team's workflow and reason codes.
No. FluxForce can be your case file, or feed a prepared case into the system you already use.
Alerts from transaction monitoring, fraud, sanctions screening, transaction screening and adverse media, from our agents or your existing tools.
Your analyst. The agents gather and summarise the evidence; the analyst decides and records the reason code. Escalations go to your MLRO.
Yes. Queues, ageing, SLA reports and quality sampling are built in, and every action shows who took it.
Escalated cases pass to reporting with the evidence attached, and the narrative draft starts from the case facts.
The full case history. Every agent step and human decision, timestamped, with the evidence as it stood.
Pick one alert type. We'll run the agents in shadow mode on your own data and show you the cases they prepare. Your team decides what happens next.