Model risk guidance is established
The US Federal Reserve and OCC guidance from 2011 expects a model inventory, independent validation and ongoing monitoring for every model in use.



28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Aiden FluxSenior AI Fraud Risk AnalystFraud Detection & Risk Scoring
Rhea LedgerSenior AI KYC/AML Compliance DirectorKYC/AML & Sanctions Screening
Nova SentinelLead AI Zero Trust Security ArchitectZero Trust Access Security
Iris VermaAI Verification SpecialistIdentity Verification & KYC
Oscar GraySenior AI OSINT Intelligence DirectorOSINT & Threat Intelligence
Bella NovaAI BNPL Risk AnalystBNPL Risk Monitoring


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All SolutionsEvery model version is tracked, compared and watched for drift once it's in production. If performance slips, you roll back to the previous version in one click. The record is built for model risk reviews under SR 11-7 and the EU AI Act.
Fraud, AML and screening decisions increasingly run on models. Each one has versions, data and thresholds that change. Without a record, nobody can say which version was live on a given day or why it changed.
The US Federal Reserve and OCC guidance from 2011 expects a model inventory, independent validation and ongoing monitoring for every model in use.
The Bank of England's PRA set model risk management principles for banks in Supervisory Statement SS1/23.
The EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) treats credit scoring as high-risk and sets documentation and oversight duties.
The agent keeps the inventory, watches each model in production and builds the evidence your model risk team needs.
We'll inventory a set of your production models and show you what the record looks like before your next review.
What was live, when, and who approved it.
Back to the last approved version, logged.
Drift and bias checked in production, not once a year.
No model change goes live without a named approver.
One keeps the inventory and reports, one keeps the record, one tests without touching customer data.
Keeps the model inventory, watches drift and bias, and builds model risk reports.
Links each model decision to the version and evidence behind it.
Generates synthetic data to test models before release.
Banks, fintechs and insurers all run models on regulated decisions. The record they need is the same.
It covers the models behind our agents, and can register your own models for inventory and monitoring.
No. It alerts the model owner and makes rollback a one-click action. A person decides.
They're structured for SR 11-7 style model risk reviews, with documentation for EU AI Act obligations where they apply.
Outcome rates are compared across the customer segments you define, and differences beyond your limit open a review.
Yes. Synthetic data and scenarios let you test a new version before it touches production.
Which model version made a decision, who approved that version, how it was validated and how it performed in production.
Pick one alert type. We'll run the agents in shadow mode on your own data and show you the cases they prepare. Your team decides what happens next.