Sanctions breaches don't need intent
OFAC can impose civil penalties on a strict liability basis, so you can be penalised for a breach you didn't know about. A missed true match is the expensive mistake.



28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Aiden FluxSenior AI Fraud Risk AnalystFraud Detection & Risk Scoring
Rhea LedgerSenior AI KYC/AML Compliance DirectorKYC/AML & Sanctions Screening
Nova SentinelLead AI Zero Trust Security ArchitectZero Trust Access Security
Iris VermaAI Verification SpecialistIdentity Verification & KYC
Oscar GraySenior AI OSINT Intelligence DirectorOSINT & Threat Intelligence
Bella NovaAI BNPL Risk AnalystBNPL Risk Monitoring


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All SolutionsCustomers and counterparties are checked against global sanctions and PEP lists. The agent separates true matches from look-alike names and shows its reasoning, so your team works the hits that matter. Every clear and every escalation is logged for your auditors.
Exact matching misses spelling variants. Loose matching floods the queue. Either way, analysts spend hours proving that a customer isn't the person on the list.
OFAC can impose civil penalties on a strict liability basis, so you can be penalised for a breach you didn't know about. A missed true match is the expensive mistake.
FATF Recommendation 12 asks for enhanced measures on foreign PEPs, including senior management approval and establishing source of wealth and source of funds.
A single Arabic, Cyrillic or Devanagari name can be written in Latin script many ways. Tools that can't handle that either miss matches or bury your team in false ones.
The agent checks each hit against everything you know about the customer, then shows your analyst the evidence for and against.
False-hit reduction claims mean nothing without your list set and match settings. We test on your own screening data and show you exactly what changed.
The evidence for and against each match, side by side.
Screening and adverse media findings in one risk view.
You set match thresholds and which clears need a person.
Proof of which list you screened against, and when.
Screening is only as good as the identity data behind it. These agents share it.
Screens customers and counterparties and resolves look-alike names.
Adds open-source context to confirm or rule out a match.
Supplies verified identity data so namesakes can be ruled out.
Screening rules differ by sector and by regulator. The agents work with the lists and thresholds your policy sets.
UN, OFAC, EU and UK sanctions lists, local lists in your market, PEP data and your own internal watchlists. You choose the list set.
Only where you've set a rule allowing it. By default, proposed clears go to an analyst, and true matches always escalate to a person.
The agent compares transliteration variants and uses date of birth, nationality and ID numbers to tell people apart. We'll test this on your own name data before go-live.
Your customer base is rescreened against the change. Only new or changed potential matches open a review.
Yes, where your PEP data source includes them. The agent links them to the PEP's profile so your analyst sees the relationship.
Which list version was used, the match details, the agent's reasoning, the analyst's decision and the reason code, all timestamped.
Pick one alert type. We'll run the agents in shadow mode on your own data and show you the cases they prepare. Your team decides what happens next.