Every regime starts its own clock
30 calendar days for a US SAR, 72 hours for a GDPR breach notice, 6 hours under CERT-In. One incident can start three clocks at once.



28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Aiden FluxSenior AI Fraud Risk AnalystFraud Detection & Risk Scoring
Rhea LedgerSenior AI KYC/AML Compliance DirectorKYC/AML & Sanctions Screening
Nova SentinelLead AI Zero Trust Security ArchitectZero Trust Access Security
Iris VermaAI Verification SpecialistIdentity Verification & KYC
Oscar GraySenior AI OSINT Intelligence DirectorOSINT & Threat Intelligence
Bella NovaAI BNPL Risk AnalystBNPL Risk Monitoring


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions


28 specialized agentsAll systems operational
Ready to transform your security infrastructure?
Explore our complete agent library and request a custom demoView All Solutions
Nolan Briefwell — Senior AI Incident Response NarratorNolan Briefwell is an AI agent that writes case and incident narratives from your case data and root cause analysis. He tracks every regulatory reporting deadline from the moment a case or incident opens, and builds the evidence pack your team reviews before anyone submits a report.

Regulatory clocks start when you detect something, and they don't wait for the facts to settle. Your team writes the narrative while still investigating, pulls evidence from several systems and checks the deadline in a calendar someone set up by hand.
for a CERT-In cyber incident report
The clock starts at detection.
30 calendar days for a US SAR, 72 hours for a GDPR breach notice, 6 hours under CERT-In. One incident can start three clocks at once.
Analysts know what happened but write it differently each time. Reviewers send drafts back for missing facts, and the clock keeps running.
Logs, timelines, transactions and approvals sit in different systems. The evidence pack gets built after the narrative, under the most time pressure.
Nolan Briefwell is a Senior AI Incident Response Narrator. He turns case data and root cause findings into a first draft, tracks each reporting deadline and builds the evidence pack, so your team spends its time reviewing.

We don't publish performance numbers from our own tests. Give Nolan Briefwell your recent closed cases and incidents and compare his drafts with the reports your team sent.
Nolan Briefwell reads from your case and incident systems through APIs. Reports still go out through your usual channels.
Case data, alerts, transactions, timelines, logs and root cause notes arrive from your case, incident and monitoring systems, and from other FluxForce agents.
When a case or incident opens, Nolan starts every clock that applies under the rules you configure, such as a SAR, an STR or a breach notice. Owners see each deadline and what's still missing.
He writes the narrative from the case record only, in the structure your reviewers expect. Missing facts and contradictions go back to the case owner as questions instead of guesses.
Nolan builds the evidence pack behind the narrative. A named reviewer edits and signs off before anyone submits. Drafts, edits and approvals go into tamper-evident evidence storage.
Run Nolan Briefwell in shadow mode on your recent cases and incidents. He drafts and tracks deadlines, and nothing is sent anywhere. Compare his drafts with the reports your team submitted.
Nolan doesn't make you compliant. He drafts the narrative and tracks the deadlines these frameworks set, and your team submits.
A first draft and a running clock when the case opens.
| CRITERIA | Analyst writes from scratch | Report templates | Nolan Briefwell |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first draft | Hours of writing per case | Faster, then manual fill-in | A draft built from the case record |
| Who signs off | Reviewer or MLRO | Reviewer or MLRO | Reviewer or MLRO, from Nolan's draft |
| Deadline tracking | Calendars and memory | Not included | Every clock you configure, from detection |
| Consistency | Varies by analyst | Same headings, uneven content | Same structure, every fact tied to the record |
| Evidence pack | Built at the end | Attached by hand | Built with the narrative |
| Where it's weaker | Slow under deadline pressure | A template can't find missing facts | Writes only from the facts he's given. A gap in case data becomes a question for the owner and slows the draft |
Nolan writes the story. These agents supply the facts and the record behind it.

Links the evidence Nolan writes from and keeps it tamper-evident.
Meet Arin
Maps which reporting obligations apply, so Nolan tracks the right clocks.
Meet Zara
Opens service incidents with facts attached, giving Nolan the timeline from the start.
Meet SolLow risk can run on its own if you allow it. Medium risk goes to a person by default. High risk always goes to a person. You set the bands per rule, channel and transaction type.
Turn Nolan off without touching the other agents or your core systems. The switch, and who used it, is stamped on the record.
Run Nolan on live data with nothing blocked or closed. Compare the calls with your team's before anything changes.
Every decision answers why, in plain English, with the signals and the rule or policy behind it.
Each decision is stored with its inputs, its reasoning and the person who approved it, in tamper-evident evidence storage.
Agents connect beside your systems through APIs. Your core banking, screening and case tools stay where they are.
What we're learning about AML, fraud and the evidence examiners ask for.






Talk to the people who build the agents. We'll answer per capability, yes or no.
An AI incident analyst drafts the narrative for a case or incident, tracks the reporting deadlines that apply and assembles the evidence. Nolan Briefwell does that from your case record and root cause findings, then hands the draft to a named reviewer who edits and signs off.
No. Nolan drafts and builds the pack. A named person reviews, signs off and submits through your usual channel. A kill switch turns Nolan off without touching your case or incident systems.
The ones you configure for your jurisdictions. Common examples are the 30-day US SAR window, the 72-hour GDPR breach notice and the 6-hour CERT-In incident report. Your compliance team confirms each rule before Nolan tracks it.
Nolan drafts from the case record only and ties each statement to its source. Where a fact is missing, he raises a question for the case owner instead of filling the gap. Your reviewer checks every draft before sign-off.
Nolan drafts narratives and tracks deadlines for recent cases and incidents, but nothing is sent anywhere. You compare his drafts with the reports your team submitted and decide what to switch on.
Case and incident records, timelines, related transactions and alerts, and root cause notes. Past submitted reports help him learn the structure and tone your reviewers expect.
FluxForce runs as SaaS, on-premise or hybrid, built on Microsoft Azure. We agree data residency and which components run inside your environment during deployment design, before any data moves.
Run Nolan Briefwell beside your current process. He works on your live data and records every call, and nothing is blocked, closed or sent until you decide.
Shadow mode results belong to you.
Start with one workflow in shadow mode, then decide how much each agent does on its own.