The Kuwait Financial Intelligence Unit (KwFIU) receives suspicious transaction reports (STRs) from banks, exchange companies, insurers, investment firms and the designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) covered by Law No. 106 of 2013. You must report any transaction or attempted transaction you suspect is linked to money laundering or terrorist financing, whatever its value, no later than two working days after the suspicion forms, through goAML. The portal is the easy part. What takes work is getting a red flag examined, decided and written up inside that window, with a narrative KwFIU can act on.
Article 12 of Law No. 106 of 2013 sets the duty: financial institutions and DNFBPs shall report to the Unit without delay any transaction or attempted transaction, regardless of its value, if they suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect it involves proceeds of crime or funds linked to money laundering or terrorism financing. Article 16 of the Executive Regulation sets the outer limit at two working days, using the methods and forms the Unit sets. KwFIU's May 2025 guidance note for banks says STRs must go through goAML, the digital platform all reporting entities in Kuwait are obliged to use.
This guide is for MLROs and compliance officers at Kuwaiti banks, exchange companies and other reporting entities. It walks through the process from the first red flag to KwFIU's follow-up questions, what each part of the report needs, how to avoid tipping off, and which records to keep. It reflects KwFIU, Central Bank of Kuwait (CBK) and statutory sources as they stood on October 17, 2026. It isn't legal advice, and the English texts used here are translations, so check the Arabic originals for anything you rely on.
Get a red flag examined, decided, written up and filed in goAML inside two working days of suspicion, then answer KwFIU's questions and keep the record.
File an STR with the Kuwait FIU (KwFIU) through goAML for any transaction or attempted transaction you suspect is linked to money laundering or terrorist financing, whatever its value, no later than two working days after the suspicion forms. Examine the red flag, record the reporting decision, and write a narrative KwFIU can follow without your files.
Every financial institution and DNFBP covered by Law No. 106 of 2013. The KwFIU FAQs list the financial institutions it receives reports from as banks, exchange companies, finance companies, agents and brokers, exchange institutions, investment companies, securities trading companies, financial brokerage firms, asset managers, mutual funds and custodians, and insurance companies. On the non-financial side they list real estate brokers, dealers in gold, gemstones and precious metals, and independent lawyers and accountants.
There is one narrow carve-out. Under Article 12, attorneys, other independent legal professionals and accountants don't have to report a transaction if they obtained the information in circumstances where professional secrecy applies. Everyone else reports, and banks carry most of the volume: the bank guidance note cites Kuwait's October 2024 mutual evaluation report, which found banks responsible for well over half of the STRs submitted to KwFIU.
Your sector also decides which supporting guidance applies. The KwFIU manuals page publishes a general guide to completing the STR form and separate STR guidance notes for banks and for exchange companies. The KwFIU indicators page publishes red-flag lists for banks, investment companies, insurers and the non-financial professions. If you run a group with a bank and an exchange company, expect two sets of sector guidance feeding one reporting process.
For the wider Kuwaiti framework, including CMA and CBK obligations beyond reporting, see our guide to Kuwait AML/CFT requirements. This article stays with the reporting process itself.
A suspicion, or reasonable grounds to suspect, that a transaction or attempted transaction involves proceeds of crime or funds linked to money laundering or terrorist financing. That covers attempted transactions, so a deal the customer abandons when you ask for documents can still be reportable. There's no minimum amount: Article 12 says regardless of the value.
Most STRs start with a red flag. Article 5 of the law requires enhanced due diligence for complex, unusual large transactions and unusual patterns with no clear economic or visible lawful purpose, including examining their background and purpose as far as reasonably possible and documenting what you find. KwFIU's bank guidance note is careful about what a red flag means: red flags do not automatically mean that a crime has been committed, but they signal the need for further diligence and examination. Its banking examples include structured cash deposits or withdrawals and incoming funds quickly sent offshore with no business justification. It also counts internal alerts, where transaction monitoring systems flag repeated rule breaches such as velocity, volume or destination.
Two points catch teams out. The first is that the value threshold for customer due diligence doesn't apply to reporting. Article 6 of the Executive Regulation sets KD 3,000 as the threshold for the due diligence that Article 5 of the law requires before a transaction for a customer you don't have an established relationship with. KwFIU's guidance note points out that, because suspicions are reportable regardless of value, an STR might be required even where the bank has not yet carried out due diligence on the customer.
The second is that you don't have to prove anything. KwFIU's guide to completing the STR form reminds reporting institutions to file as soon as suspicion has arisen and not to seek to prove a predicate offense, money laundering or terrorism financing. If the examination runs until the case is airtight, it will usually run past the deadline.
If you can't complete due diligence at all, Article 5 tells you to refuse or end the relationship and to consider filing a report to the Unit.
The reporting test is suspicion, not proof, and it has no value floor. Write that into your procedure in those words, because analysts trained on threshold-based reports will otherwise look for a number.
No later than two working days after you form a suspicion or have reasonable grounds to suspect. Article 16 of the Executive Regulation sets that limit and tells you to report following the methods and forms set by the Unit. KwFIU's guidance note repeats it: the STR needs to reach KwFIU no later than 2 working days after the suspicion has materialised.
Banks should read one more source. The CBK's AML/CFT instructions say a bank shall report within two days maximum to KwFIU, regardless of value. That wording doesn't say working days. Until your legal team confirms otherwise, our suggestion is that CBK-licensed banks plan to the shorter reading.
The clock has a soft start. The bank guidance note says the law doesn't define a maximum timeline for the examination, or for escalation and the formal decision, but that these need to be concluded as quickly as possible. That leaves each institution to define, in writing, the point at which suspicion has formed. If your policy starts the clock only when a committee signs, an examiner may ask why the analyst's notes showed suspicion days earlier.
| Timing point | What the source says | Practical reading |
|---|---|---|
| Red flag to end of examination | No maximum set; conclude as quickly as possible (KwFIU bank guidance) | Set an internal target and track ageing |
| Escalation and formal decision | No maximum set; conclude as quickly as possible (KwFIU bank guidance) | Schedule committee sittings so they never hold a case past the deadline |
| Suspicion formed to STR filed | No later than 2 working days (Executive Regulation, Article 16) | The legal ceiling for all reporting entities |
| Suspicion formed to STR filed (banks) | Within two days maximum (CBK instructions) | Plan to two calendar days unless legal advises otherwise |
| KwFIU request to your response | Within the timeframe the Unit prescribes (Executive Regulation, Article 16) | Treat as a separate tracked deadline |
Seven steps cover the process, from the first red flag to the questions KwFIU may send after it reads your report. The sources assign some of them to particular functions; the rest are for your procedure to define.
The first figure shows the core path. A red flag sends the transaction to examination by the compliance or risk function. Examination ends in a reporting decision taken higher up the hierarchy or by a reporting committee. A reporting decision to file sends the STR through goAML, the platform every reporting entity in Kuwait must use. From goAML, the STR reaches KwFIU for operational analysis.
Red flags reach compliance from monitoring alerts, front-line staff, due diligence reviews, screening hits and requests from authorities. Record the date and source of each one. That record becomes part of the report: the STR form guide asks when, where and how the suspicious transaction or behaviour was detected, including through which monitoring.
The bank guidance note says the examination is usually carried out by the risk function or the compliance function, meaning operational staff with insight into money laundering and terrorist financing risks. This is the enhanced due diligence Article 5 requires: look at the background and purpose of the transaction and document all information about it and the identity of everyone involved. Pull the customer's profile, the account history, linked parties and any earlier reports. Ask the customer for information only through approved procedures that won't reveal a report is being considered.
The bank guidance note says the formal decision to submit a report to KwFIU is usually taken by persons higher up the formal hierarchy. For banks, the CBK's compilation lists an August 2019 circular obligating banks to form a committee assigned to decide on reporting suspicious transactions to KwFIU. Smaller firms work differently. The exchange-company guidance note says some entities have a designated committee, but at an exchange company the decision would normally be taken by the director or owner. Whoever decides, record the decision, the reasons and the date, including decisions not to report.
Assemble the subject details, accounts, transactions, narrative, measures taken and supporting documents. The next section covers each part. Name a contact who knows the case: the form guide says KwFIU must be given contact details for the compliance officer, or the person who replaces them in their absence, who is familiar with the report and the transactions in it.
File in goAML. The May 2025 guidance notes for banks and exchange companies both say STRs submitted to KwFIU need to be communicated via goAML, which all reporting entities in Kuwait are obliged to use. If you're new to the platform, our explainer on what goAML is and how FIUs use it covers the basics. We found no public English guide to Kuwait's goAML registration on KwFIU's manuals, forms, FAQs or circulars pages on October 17, 2026, so get your registration and user set-up confirmed with KwFIU before your first report is due.
KwFIU may come back to you. Under Article 18 of the law it can obtain any additional information it deems necessary from anyone subject to the reporting duty, within the time limits it specifies. Article 16 of the Executive Regulation adds that you must provide relevant information or copies of documents, however stored, within the timeframe the Unit prescribes. Track these requests the same way you track the filing deadline.
After filing, apply enhanced measures to the relationship: the form guide mentions enhanced due diligence, monitoring the customer's accounts and transactions, and measures limiting disposal of funds, while taking care not to suggest to the customer that a report will be filed. Under Article 11, keep a copy of the STR and related documents for at least five years from the date you sent it. For banks, the CBK expects periodic reports to the board to include a statement of all suspicious transactions monitored, their impacts and the measures compliance staff took.
| Step | Owner the sources point to | Record to keep |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Detect | Monitoring, front line, due diligence | Alert or referral with date and source |
| 2. Examine | Risk or compliance function | Enhanced due diligence findings and documents |
| 3. Decide | Higher in the hierarchy or a reporting committee | Decision, reasons, date, and decisions not to report |
| 4. Prepare | Compliance officer | Draft report and annexes |
| 5. Submit | Authorised goAML user | Filing date and KwFIU reference |
| 6. Respond | Compliance officer | Request, response and dates |
| 7. Follow up | Compliance, relationship owners, board | Post-report measures and board reporting |
Illustrative scenario, not a customer result.
A retail bank in Kuwait gets a monitoring alert on a salaried customer's account. Over nine days, cash deposits of just under KD 3,000 arrive at four branches, and most of the money leaves within a day by transfer to an account abroad with no stated purpose. The bank, the customer and the amounts are invented to show the process, not drawn from a real case.
On day one the analyst reviews the account and finds the deposits don't fit the customer's declared salary. Structured cash deposits and funds quickly sent offshore are both on KwFIU's banking red-flag list. The analyst asks the relationship manager what the customer has said about the account, without raising the alert, and finds no explanation on file.
KwFIU's guide to completing the STR form sets out six parts: the reporting institution, the suspicious transaction information (subjects and their accounts), the transaction details, a detailed description of the reason for reporting, the measures taken by the reporting institution, and the documents annexed. The guide was written for KwFIU's original report form, but it's the most detailed public statement of what KwFIU wants in each field. Use it as your content standard while goAML sets the format.
The second figure maps the case file to those parts. The case file supplies the subject details: names, dates of birth, nationalities, occupations, addresses and PEP status. You also take the account details from the case file for every account the subject holds with you. The transaction details come from the case file too, including status, type, date, currency, amount and the parties on each side. You build the narrative from the case file, using the examination findings and the red flags. The measures taken before and after the suspicion arose should already be logged in the case file. Finally, attach the annexed documents from the case file that back up each statement.
For subjects, the form provides for up to three, each marked as the main subject or an associate subject. For a company, give information on the legal entity and on the natural persons linked to it, such as directors and beneficial owners.
Report the subject's accounts whether or not they were used in the suspicious transaction. Investigators need the subject's whole financial footprint if they later trace or freeze funds.
For each transaction, state whether it was carried out, attempted, postponed, delayed or canceled. If transactions aren't clearly related, the guide advises filing separate reports. If you're updating an earlier report, quote the KwFIU reference number you received for it.
The bank guidance note gives a shorter version of the same list: the customer, the transaction, all information related to the examination including analysis, the reason for suspicion (the narrative) and supporting documentation such as transaction records and copies of due diligence documents.
| STR part | What to include | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting institution | Name, branch, compliance contact and a deputy; earlier KwFIU reference if this is an update | Compliance records |
| Subjects | Up to three per form, main or associate; for companies, directors and beneficial owners | Customer and due diligence file |
| Accounts | All the subject's accounts, involved or not, with balances and activity during the suspicion period | Core banking or ledger |
| Transactions | Status, type, date, currency, amount, originator and receiver | Transaction records |
| Reason for reporting | The narrative: what happened, why it's suspicious, source and purpose of funds | Examination findings |
| Measures taken | How it was detected, internal measures, post-report measures | Case notes and decisions |
| Annexed documents | Transaction records, statements, ID documents, account contracts, correspondence | Case file |
The form guide calls the detailed description of the reason for reporting the most important part of the submission, because it should describe the suspicious transactions or accounts in great detail. It asks for the volume, sequence, links, originators and beneficial owners of the transactions, and the indicators that apply. It also asks for information on the source and purpose of the funds and whether they relate to proceeds of crime or terrorist financing.
The most useful sentence in the guide is a reminder about the reader. KwFIU officers do not have access to client files or a working knowledge of the client's business. A narrative that says "activity inconsistent with profile" assumes they know the profile. Spell it out: what the customer told you they do, what you expected to see, what you actually saw, and why the gap matters.
A narrative structure that works for most Kuwaiti STRs:
If any employee may have colluded, been negligent or turned a blind eye, the guide asks you to say so and describe the measures you took. Our SAR narrative template gives a structure you can adapt to KwFIU's fields.
Check one thing about language. KwFIU's 2014 circular and 2015 circular told financial institutions and DNFBPs to send their STRs in Arabic. The 2025 guidance notes don't restate a language requirement, so confirm with KwFIU what language it expects in goAML narratives today.
KwFIU analyses the report. The bank guidance note describes KwFIU as an administrative authority, not a law enforcement body. An STR is intelligence rather than a complaint: the note says it isn't a police report and can't be used by law enforcement or prosecution as evidence of criminality.
The third figure shows the paths after filing. When KwFIU's analysis confirms the suspicion, KwFIU sends a dissemination report to the Public Prosecutor's Office. The Public Prosecutor's Office often asks a unit of the Ministry of Interior to carry out the preliminary investigation. KwFIU can also send the reporting entity a request for additional information. The reporting entity answers KwFIU within the time it sets. Meanwhile the reporting entity applies enhanced due diligence to the relationship.
The sources behind those paths are specific. Article 19 of the law says that where the Unit has reasonable grounds to suspect funds are proceeds of crime or linked to money laundering or terrorist financing, it shall notify the public prosecutor's office and forward the relevant information to competent authorities. The guidance note adds that the Public Prosecutor's Office would often decide that the Money Laundering Unit or the Terrorist Financing Unit of the Ministry of Interior should carry out the preliminary investigation.
You won't usually hear the outcome. Plan for requests instead: the data KwFIU asks for later is often the account history and documents you held back from the first report.
Article 13 of the law prohibits financial institutions and DNFBPs, their directors and employees from disclosing to a customer or any other person that a report has been made, or any information related to the Unit or to a money laundering or terrorism financing investigation. KwFIU's guidance note puts it plainly: it is illegal to inform a customer about an STR being submitted. The CBK's instructions apply the same ban to banks, covering reports that have been filed or will be filed.
The law also says who can know. The prohibition doesn't prevent disclosures between directors and employees of the institution, or to lawyers, competent authorities and the public prosecution.
The fourth figure draws that boundary. Inside the permitted circle, the compliance officer can discuss the report with directors and employees of the institution who need to act on it. The compliance officer can also share it with lawyers advising the institution. The compliance officer can provide information to competent authorities. The compliance officer can provide information to the public prosecution. Nothing about the report goes to the customer.
Most tipping-off risk comes from ordinary operations rather than a careless remark. A relationship manager who suddenly asks pointed questions, a payment that's blocked with an explanation that hints at compliance, or a customer letter generated by an automated workflow can all give the game away. Limit access to STR decisions and drafts to the people who need them, and agree a script for customer contact after a report.
The law also protects staff who report. Article 13 removes penal, civil, disciplinary and administrative liability for breaching a disclosure restriction where a report or other information was provided to the Unit in good faith.
Article 11 requires you to keep copies of STRs and related documents for at least five years after the date you made the report to the Unit. Transaction records must also be kept for at least five years and be detailed enough to permit the reconstruction of each individual transaction. A competent authority can require longer retention in specific cases.
Keep the decision trail as well as the filing. An examiner who reads a filed STR will ask how long the examination took and who decided. An examiner who finds an alert closed without a report will ask why. The enhanced due diligence records Article 5 requires for unusual transactions answer both questions, if you've kept them.
Article 35 of the law punishes anyone who deliberately or by gross negligence fails to make a report, presents false statements or conceals facts that should be disclosed, or tips off a third party, with imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of KD 5,000 to KD 500,000, or one of those penalties. Where a legal person commits either offense, the fine is KD 5,000 to KD 1 million. Article 33 adds a fine of KD 5,000 to KD 500,000 per violation for an institution that deliberately or through gross negligence breaches the due diligence, compliance and record-keeping articles. Separately, under Article 15 supervisors can impose measures including a fine on a financial institution of up to KD 500,000 per violation.
| Failure | Statutory consequence |
|---|---|
| Not reporting, false statements, concealing facts (deliberate or grossly negligent) | Up to 3 years' imprisonment and a fine of KD 5,000 to 500,000, or either (Article 35) |
| Tipping off in breach of Article 13 | Same as above (Article 35) |
| Either offense committed by a legal person | Fine of KD 5,000 to 1 million (Article 35) |
| Deliberate or grossly negligent breach of Articles 5, 9, 10 or 11 by an institution | Fine of KD 5,000 to 500,000 per violation (Article 33) |
| Breach of the law, regulation or instructions found by a supervisor | Supervisory measures, including a fine of up to KD 500,000 per violation for a financial institution (Article 15) |
Most STR failures happen in the handoffs between teams rather than in the reading of the law.
If policy says the two working days run from the committee's decision, but the analyst's notes show suspicion three days earlier, you've filed late on your own evidence. Define the trigger in writing and train analysts to record the moment their concern becomes a suspicion.
A weekly sitting can't meet a two-day limit. Give the committee a way to decide urgent cases between meetings, with the same record.
KwFIU officers don't have access to client files. A narrative full of internal codes and "see attached" leaves the analyst at KwFIU to reconstruct your case.
The form guide still tells filers to hand reports to the chairman's office in a special, secret envelope, while KwFIU's 2025 guidance says goAML is the channel. The KwFIU circulars page still lists Circular FI/1/2015 on STRs next to its 2025 high-risk country circulars, so old and new instructions sit side by side. Procedures copied from older manuals can send staff the wrong way.
The examination record Article 5 requires for unusual transactions should show why an alert didn't become an STR. If it doesn't, an examiner will read the alert as ignored.
Freezing a card with a message about "compliance review" tells the customer more than any conversation would. Route post-report measures through someone who knows the tipping-off rules.
KwFIU publishes separate indicators for banks, investment companies, insurers and the non-financial professions. An exchange company running a bank's red-flag list will miss its own patterns.
The law places reporting duties on the institution and its staff, the KwFIU guidance places the decision higher in the hierarchy, and the CBK holds the board to account for what compliance reports. Article 10 requires the compliance officer to be appointed at senior management level. For banks, the CBK requires the compliance officer to act with sufficient operational independence and to be responsible to senior management.
The fifth figure shows where an AI agent layer can sit without taking any of those decisions. Case data flows into the agent layer, which gathers the records and drafts the file. The agent layer passes the prepared case to the analyst, who checks it and decides whether suspicion has formed. The analyst escalates to the compliance officer. The compliance officer brings the case to the reporting committee where the institution has one. The reporting committee decides, and an authorised person completes the goAML submission. The compliance officer reports to the board on suspicious transactions and the measures taken.
Automation can carry the assembly work in that chain: pulling records, drafting the narrative and tracking the two-working-day clock. For how that fits a wider compliance operation, see our guide to automated regulatory reporting. None of it moves the suspicion decision, the reporting decision or the submission away from the people the law and the CBK hold responsible.
Core systems hold the records, an AI agent layer gathers them and drafts the file, the analyst decides whether suspicion has formed, the compliance officer and reporting committee decide whether to report, an authorised person submits in goAML, and the board receives periodic reports.
| Component | Responsibility | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Core systems and case data | Hold the customer, account and transaction records. | Make no reporting decision. |
| AI agent layer | Gathers records, drafts the case file and STR, and tracks deadlines. | Doesn't decide suspicion or approve or submit a report. |
| Analyst | Examines the alert and records when suspicion has formed. | Doesn't file on their own authority. |
| Compliance officer | Owns the reporting process and the KwFIU relationship. | Can't delegate accountability to a system. |
| Reporting committee or senior decision-maker | Decides whether to report and records why. | Decides urgent cases between scheduled meetings. |
| Board | Receives periodic reports on suspicious transactions and the measures taken. | Doesn't review individual reports. |
The analyst decides whether suspicion has formed, the compliance officer and the reporting committee decide whether to report, and an authorised person submits in goAML. The institution decides how much each agent does on its own, and every agent has a kill switch.
Reporting duty regardless of value (Art. 12), tipping off, permitted disclosures and good-faith protection (Art. 13), enhanced due diligence on unusual transactions (Art. 5), compliance officer (Art. 10), five-year records (Art. 11), KwFIU status, requests and dissemination (Arts. 16, 18, 19), penalties (Arts. 15, 33, 35).
English translation published by KwFIU, including amendments up to Law No. 76 of 2025; the Arabic text governs. Byte-identical to the content-stage copy on 2026-10-17.
2026-10-17
Two-working-day reporting limit and duty to answer KwFIU requests within its timeframe (Art. 16); KD 3,000 due diligence threshold (Art. 6).
English translation published by KwFIU. Byte-identical to the content-stage copy on 2026-10-17.
2026-10-17
Examination by the risk or compliance function, decision higher in the hierarchy, no maximum examination timeline, STR contents, goAML as the mandatory channel, dissemination to the Public Prosecutor's Office, red flags.
Sector guidance notes dated May 2025, published on the KwFIU manuals page. Byte-identical to the content-stage copies on 2026-10-17.
2026-10-17
Content of each report part, the narrative as the most important part, KwFIU's lack of access to client files, no need to prove a predicate offense, post-report measures without tipping off.
Written for KwFIU's original paper report form; goAML is the current channel. Byte-identical to the content-stage copy on 2026-10-17.
2026-10-17
Banks report within two days maximum; tipping-off ban; compliance officer independence; board reporting on suspicious transactions; August 2019 circular requiring a reporting committee.
Applies to CBK-regulated banks. Byte-identical to the content-stage copy on 2026-10-17.
2026-10-17
| Metric | Definition | Decision guardrail |
|---|---|---|
| Suspicion to filing | Working days from recorded suspicion to goAML submission. | Every report inside the legal limit; investigate any breach. |
| Alert to suspicion | Days from red flag to the analyst's recorded conclusion. | Track ageing; don't pressure analysts to conclude early. |
| Decisions not to report with reasons | Share of closed alerts with a recorded reason. | The target is all of them. |
| KwFIU requests answered on time | Requests answered within the time KwFIU set. | Track each request as its own deadline. |
| Narrative completeness | Sampled STRs that state who, expected activity, what happened, red flags, checks and measures. | Reviewed by someone who didn't write them. |
Filing an STR with the Kuwait FIU means reporting any suspected transaction or attempt, whatever its value, through goAML within two working days of the suspicion forming. The law sets no separate limit for the examination, and the reporting decision has to fit inside the two working days after suspicion forms. Write narratives for a reader who can't see your files, protect the report from the customer, and keep every decision, including the ones not to report, for at least five years.
The Kuwait Financial Intelligence Unit (KwFIU) is the independent body set up under Article 16 of Law No. 106 of 2013 to receive, request, analyse and disseminate information on suspected proceeds of crime and funds linked to money laundering or terrorist financing. It is an administrative authority, not a law enforcement body.
Through goAML. KwFIU's May 2025 guidance notes say STRs submitted to KwFIU need to be communicated via goAML, which all reporting entities in Kuwait must use. Confirm your registration and user set-up with KwFIU before you need to file.
No later than two working days after the suspicion forms, under Article 16 of the Executive Regulation. The CBK's instructions tell banks to report within two days maximum, so banks may want to plan to that shorter reading.
No. Article 12 of Law No. 106 requires reports regardless of the value of the transaction, and it covers attempted transactions too.
No. Article 13 prohibits disclosing a report, or information related to the Unit or an investigation, to the customer or anyone else, apart from permitted disclosures inside the institution and to lawyers, competent authorities and the public prosecution. Under Article 35, tipping off can be punished with imprisonment and fines.
At least five years after the date the report was made to the Unit, for copies of the report and related documents. A competent authority can require longer.
An AI agent can gather the records, draft the report and track the deadline. The decision that a transaction is suspicious, and the decision to file, stay with your analyst, compliance officer and reporting committee, and an authorised person submits the report.