Listen to our podcast 🎧
In 2025, banks have seen a sharp 60% rise in financial fraud attempts. Instant payment settlements now give institutions almost no time to spot and stop suspicious activity.
While more banks are turning to AI-powered solutions to assess payment risks, the same technology is also being used by fraudsters. With generative AI tools widely accessible, deepfakes and synthetic identities have become powerful weapons. The number of deepfake-related frauds in the first half of 2025 has already surpassed all previous years combined.
As AI continues to drive both fraud and defence, Chief Risk Officers are under pressure to strengthen detection systems without slowing customer transactions. This article shares strategies for banks to use AI-driven risk scoring engines in building consistent and adaptive fraud detection systems.
The adoption of AI‑powered risk assessment systems is now becoming standard across major banks. Institutions such as Capital One, JPMorgan Chase and HSBC were early adopters of machine‑learning‑based scoring engines, but these tools are now used widely throughout the industry.
Over 90 % of banks now use AI-driven fraud controls. The adoption of AI-based transaction scoring is growing steadily, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.42 %. These systems have become central to risk management, helping banks monitor transactions instantly and respond to suspicious activity without slowing payments.
Banks use AI to evaluate millions of transactions instantly. AI identifies suspicious activity, reduces false positives, and maintains smooth transaction processing, even at large scale where human monitoring would be insufficient. Here’s how banks apply AI to strengthen fraud detection across their operations:
1. Assigning Risk Scores Instantly for Every Transaction: AI evaluates every transaction in real time and assigns a risk score based on historical patterns, behaviour, and device signals. High-risk transactions trigger immediate action, so banks stop fraud while letting legitimate payments continue seamlessly.
2. Adapting to New Fraud Patterns Automatically: Machine learning allows systems to learn from emerging fraud tactics. Banks can detect synthetic identities, deepfakes, and evolving attack methods without manual intervention.
3. Identifying Anomalous Behaviour Across Transactions: AI continuously compares current transactions to normal patterns. When deviations trigger, it alerts immediately, helping banks prevent fraud and ensure customer satisfaction.
4. Prioritizing High-Risk Cases for Efficient Review: AI-driven risk engines rank transactions by their risk level and guides teams to address the most critical cases first. Banks stay focused on the high-risk fraud cases, improving detection efficiency and reducing manual review workload.
5. Integrating Fraud Scoring with Compliance and AML Systems: AI connects directly with compliance and anti-money-laundering systems to give CROs a complete view of transactional risk and maintain regulatory alignment while strengthening overall fraud management processes.
Real-time financial fraud monitoring has reduced exposure to losses and strengthened trust across digital payment channels of major financial organizations. AI systems respond immediately to high-risk activity while maintaining smooth transaction operations. The impact of these systems can be seen across multiple areas of banking operations:
Implementing real-time transaction scoring requires balancing security and user experience. Banks face several challenges when deploying AI-driven fraud detection systems.
1. Speed Requirements- AI modules must detect fraudulent transactions in milliseconds. Customers expect instant approvals, especially for point-of-sale and peer-to-peer payments. Delays in risk assessment harm user experience and may drive customers to competitors.
2. Performance in Scaled Environments- Banks handle millions of transactions daily across mobile apps, online banking, ATMs, and merchant terminals. Fraud scoring models must maintain speed and accuracy regardless of transaction volume to ensure reliable protection.
3. Managing False Positives- Machine learning models require constant refinement to improve detection accuracy. Overly strict systems block legitimate transactions, frustrating customers. Overly permissive systems allow fraud, creating financial losses and reputational damage.
4. Data Quality and Model Training- Effective fraud detection depends on high-quality training data. Historical transactions must be accurately labelled to distinguish legitimate activity from fraud. Incomplete or mislabelled data produces unreliable models and poor decision-making.
Before implementing AI fraud models in enterprise banking, CROs must design strategies that balance security, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance. Effective approaches reduce financial losses, optimize resources, and maintain customer trust while leveraging real-time transaction scoring capabilities.
CROs must define precise risk levels for transactions that trigger alerts or automated actions. Clear thresholds allow teams to focus on genuinely high-risk activity, preventing unnecessary friction for low-risk transactions and reducing operational burden and false positives.
AI-driven risk scores must connect with payment processing, AML, and compliance platforms. Integration provides a comprehensive view of transactional risk, streamlines decision-making across departments, and ensures regulatory alignment without slowing operational flow.
Scoring engines rank transactions based on severity. Focusing on high-risk activity first helps reduce potential financial losses and improves detection efficiency, keeping low-risk transactions flowing without overloading operational teams.
Machine learning models require regular retraining to remain effective against evolving threats. CROs oversee data quality, emerging fraud patterns, and model performance to maintain accuracy, reduce false positives, and ensure adaptive fraud detection across all transaction channels.
Automated alerts notify teams immediately of suspicious activity and trigger predefined response actions. This approach limits exposure to fraud, reduces investigation delays, and ensures consistent operational handling of high-risk transactions across payment systems and customer channels.
Every AI-driven decision generates a complete audit trail, capturing the factors influencing each action. CROs can demonstrate regulatory compliance, respond to inquiries efficiently, and maintain oversight of fraud mitigation processes while adhering to AML and governance standards.
For heads of onboarding, the real opportunity lies in transforming compliance from a checklist into a continuous intelligence system. Traditional KYC methods verify once but modern digital identity proofing verifies continuously as behavior, data, and risk evolve.
That’s where the next stage of AML strategy is heading toward predictive models that not only detect fraud but also anticipate it. Leaders who act early can reduce investigation time, lower operational costs, and build a more resilient compliance posture.
In the next few years, digital identity proofing will determine who wins in the digital banking race. Banks that can combine automation, AI-driven verification, and transparent governance will onboard faster, comply better, and retain more customers with less risk.